2002 Chevrolet Astro vs. 2001 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover (222 HP) has 35 more horse power than 2002 Chevrolet Astro. (187 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2002 Chevrolet Astro.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover (407 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chevrolet Astro. (339 Nm). This means 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chevrolet Astro.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Astro | 2001 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Chevrolet | Land Rover |
Model | Astro | Range Rover |
Year Released | 2002 | 2001 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 222 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 407 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2550 mm |