2002 Chevrolet Astro vs. 2003 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2003 Pagani Zonda is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. At 7,010 cc (12 cylinders), 2003 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Pagani Zonda (542 HP) has 355 more horse power than 2002 Chevrolet Astro. (187 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Pagani Zonda should accelerate faster than 2002 Chevrolet Astro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 830 kg more than 2003 Pagani Zonda.
Because 2002 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Pagani Zonda. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chevrolet Astro | 2003 Pagani Zonda | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Pagani |
| Model | Astro | Zonda |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4294 cc | 7010 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 542 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2080 kg | 1250 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4395 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 2055 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1151 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2730 mm |
