2002 Chevrolet Astro vs. 2004 Ford E-350
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 2002 Chevrolet Astro. (187 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2002 Chevrolet Astro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 408 kg more than 2002 Chevrolet Astro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chevrolet Astro. (339 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chevrolet Astro.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Astro | 2004 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Astro | E-350 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
Body Type | Minivan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 475 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 90.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 106 mm |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2080 kg | 2488 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 2140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 132 L |