2002 Chevrolet Astro vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Astro (187 HP) has 108 more horse power than 2011 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Because 2002 Chevrolet Astro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Chevrolet Astro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Astro (339 Nm) has 231 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 2002 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Astro | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | Astro | Micra |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 108 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2449 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 46 L |