2002 Chevrolet Astro vs. 2012 Audi A6
To start off, 2012 Audi A6 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A6 (242 HP) has 55 more horse power than 2002 Chevrolet Astro. (187 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2002 Chevrolet Astro.
Because 2012 Audi A6 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Chevrolet Astro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chevrolet Astro | 2012 Audi A6 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Audi |
| Model | Astro | A6 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4294 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 242 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4915 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2911 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 75 L |
