2002 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1949 Triumph Renown
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 820 kg more than 1949 Triumph Renown.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (461 Nm) has 313 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Triumph Renown. (148 Nm). This means 2002 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Triumph Renown.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Camaro | 1949 Triumph Renown | |
Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
Model | Camaro | Renown |
Year Released | 2002 | 1949 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5700 cc | 2088 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 461 Nm | 148 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2750 mm |