2002 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1950 DKW F 89
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 1240 kg more than 1950 DKW F 89.
Because 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chevrolet Camaro | 1950 DKW F 89 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | DKW |
| Model | Camaro | F 89 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5700 cc | 684 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 24 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 860 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2360 mm |
