2002 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1951 MG YB
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 MG YB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 MG YB would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (320 HP) has 275 more horse power than 1951 MG YB. (45 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1951 MG YB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 440 kg more than 1951 MG YB. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (454 Nm) has 375 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 MG YB. (79 Nm). This means 2002 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 MG YB.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chevrolet Camaro | 1951 MG YB | |
| Make | Chevrolet | MG |
| Model | Camaro | YB |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1951 |
| Engine Size | 5700 cc | 1250 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 320 HP | 45 HP |
| Torque | 454 Nm | 79 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1060 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1510 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2520 mm |
