2002 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1952 Triumph Renown
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (320 HP) has 254 more horse power than 1952 Triumph Renown. (66 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1952 Triumph Renown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 220 kg more than 1952 Triumph Renown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (454 Nm) has 307 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Triumph Renown. (147 Nm). This means 2002 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Triumph Renown.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chevrolet Camaro | 1952 Triumph Renown | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
| Model | Camaro | Renown |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5700 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 320 HP | 66 HP |
| Torque | 454 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2750 mm |
