2002 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1953 Hudson Super Wasp
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Super Wasp would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 501 kg more than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (461 Nm) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. (349 Nm). This means 2002 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Camaro | 1953 Hudson Super Wasp | |
Make | Chevrolet | Hudson |
Model | Camaro | Super Wasp |
Year Released | 2002 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5700 cc | 4293 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 140 HP |
Torque | 461 Nm | 349 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1599 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 75 L |