2002 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1953 Studebaker Commander

To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Studebaker Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Studebaker Commander would be higher. At 3,809 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Studebaker Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (158 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1953 Studebaker Commander. (120 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1953 Studebaker Commander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Studebaker Commander weights approximately 279 kg more than 2002 Chevrolet Camaro.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (271 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Studebaker Commander. (258 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2002 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Studebaker Commander. 1953 Studebaker Commander has automatic transmission and 2002 Chevrolet Camaro has manual transmission. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1953 Studebaker Commander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Chevrolet Camaro 1953 Studebaker Commander
Make Chevrolet Studebaker
Model Camaro Commander
Year Released 2002 1953
Body Type Coupe Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3390 cc 3809 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 158 HP 120 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 271 Nm 258 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 2000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 7.0:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1413 kg 1692 kg
Vehicle Length 4910 mm 5140 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1310 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 3070 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]