2002 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1954 Fiat Campagnola
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 850 kg more than 1954 Fiat Campagnola.
Because 1954 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Camaro | 1954 Fiat Campagnola | |
Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
Model | Camaro | Campagnola |
Year Released | 2002 | 1954 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5700 cc | 1901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 52 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2260 mm |