2002 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1962 Volvo 220
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (190 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1962 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1962 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 575 kg more than 1962 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (305 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2002 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chevrolet Camaro | 1962 Volvo 220 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
| Model | Camaro | 220 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2610 mm |
