2002 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1964 Jaguar MK X
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (320 HP) has 68 more horse power than 1964 Jaguar MK X. (252 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1964 Jaguar MK X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Jaguar MK X weights approximately 390 kg more than 2002 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (454 Nm) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Jaguar MK X. (361 Nm). This means 2002 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Jaguar MK X.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Camaro | 1964 Jaguar MK X | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jaguar |
Model | Camaro | MK X |
Year Released | 2002 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5700 cc | 3781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 252 HP |
Torque | 454 Nm | 361 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1890 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 63 L |