2002 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1965 MG 1100
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 MG 1100 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 1275 kg more than 1965 MG 1100.
Because 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 MG 1100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (461 Nm) has 378 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 MG 1100. (83 Nm). This means 2002 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Camaro | 1965 MG 1100 | |
Make | Chevrolet | MG |
Model | Camaro | 1100 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5700 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 461 Nm | 83 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 825 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2380 mm |