2002 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1965 Morgan 4
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (190 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1965 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1965 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 930 kg more than 1965 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Camaro | 1965 Morgan 4 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Morgan |
Model | Camaro | 4 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1340 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 55 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2450 mm |