2002 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1966 Daihatsu Compagno
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Daihatsu Compagno. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Daihatsu Compagno would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 1335 kg more than 1966 Daihatsu Compagno.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (461 Nm) has 395 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Daihatsu Compagno. (66 Nm). This means 2002 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Daihatsu Compagno.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chevrolet Camaro | 1966 Daihatsu Compagno | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Daihatsu |
| Model | Camaro | Compagno |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5700 cc | 797 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 35 HP |
| Torque | 461 Nm | 66 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 765 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2230 mm |
