2002 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1967 Fiat 500
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Fiat 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Fiat 500 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 1620 kg more than 1967 Fiat 500.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (461 Nm) has 437 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Fiat 500. (24 Nm). This means 2002 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Fiat 500.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Camaro | 1967 Fiat 500 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
Model | Camaro | 500 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1967 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 5700 cc | 499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 14 HP |
Torque | 461 Nm | 24 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1310 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 1850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 22 L |