2002 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1969 Lincoln Continental

To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,544 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Lincoln Continental (365 HP) has 45 more horse power than 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. (320 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 707 kg more than 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Lincoln Continental (678 Nm) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. (454 Nm). This means 1969 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. 1969 Lincoln Continental has automatic transmission and 2002 Chevrolet Camaro has manual transmission. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1969 Lincoln Continental will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: