2002 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1969 Mazda Luce
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Mazda Luce. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Mazda Luce would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (320 HP) has 214 more horse power than 1969 Mazda Luce. (106 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1969 Mazda Luce. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 245 kg more than 1969 Mazda Luce. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (454 Nm) has 279 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Mazda Luce. (175 Nm). This means 2002 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Mazda Luce.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Camaro | 1969 Mazda Luce | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Camaro | Luce |
Year Released | 2002 | 1969 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5700 cc | 2618 cc |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 106 HP |
Torque | 454 Nm | 175 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1255 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2590 mm |