2002 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1974 Citroen CX
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Citroen CX would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 580 kg more than 1974 Citroen CX.
Because 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (461 Nm) has 245 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Citroen CX. (216 Nm). This means 2002 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Camaro | 1974 Citroen CX | |
Make | Chevrolet | Citroen |
Model | Camaro | CX |
Year Released | 2002 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5700 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 95 HP |
Torque | 461 Nm | 216 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1520 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 3100 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 68 L |