2002 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1977 Suzuki LJ 50
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Suzuki LJ 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Suzuki LJ 50 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 1360 kg more than 1977 Suzuki LJ 50.
Because 1977 Suzuki LJ 50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Suzuki LJ 50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (461 Nm) has 409 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Suzuki LJ 50. (52 Nm). This means 2002 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Suzuki LJ 50.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Camaro | 1977 Suzuki LJ 50 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
Model | Camaro | LJ 50 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1977 |
Engine Size | 5700 cc | 539 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 26 HP |
Torque | 461 Nm | 52 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 1940 mm |