2002 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1978 Mercedes-Benz T
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mercedes-Benz T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mercedes-Benz T would be higher. At 3,390 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 63 kg more than 1978 Mercedes-Benz T.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Camaro | 1978 Mercedes-Benz T | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Camaro | T |
Year Released | 2002 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3390 cc | 2307 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1413 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2800 mm |