2002 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1984 Dodge Lancer
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Dodge Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Dodge Lancer would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (190 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1984 Dodge Lancer. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1984 Dodge Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 390 kg more than 1984 Dodge Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Dodge Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chevrolet Camaro | 1984 Dodge Lancer | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Dodge |
| Model | Camaro | Lancer |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 2212 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2630 mm |
