2002 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1989 Citroen XM
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. At 3,390 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (158 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1989 Citroen XM. (110 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1989 Citroen XM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 33 kg more than 1989 Citroen XM. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (271 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Citroen XM. (255 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2002 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Citroen XM.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Camaro | 1989 Citroen XM | |
Make | Chevrolet | Citroen |
Model | Camaro | XM |
Year Released | 2002 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3390 cc | 2088 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 255 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 21.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1413 kg | 1380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 80 L |