2002 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1993 Rover 200
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Rover 200 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (190 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1993 Rover 200. (121 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1993 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 550 kg more than 1993 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (305 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Rover 200. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Camaro | 1993 Rover 200 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Rover |
Model | Camaro | 200 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 121 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1040 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2510 mm |