2002 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1993 Suzuki Swift
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Suzuki Swift. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Suzuki Swift would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 1270 kg more than 1993 Suzuki Swift.
Because 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Suzuki Swift, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (461 Nm) has 358 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Suzuki Swift. (103 Nm). This means 2002 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Suzuki Swift.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Camaro | 1993 Suzuki Swift | |
Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
Model | Camaro | Swift |
Year Released | 2002 | 1993 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5700 cc | 1296 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 69 HP |
Torque | 461 Nm | 103 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 40 L |