2002 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1994 Mazda 323
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 945 kg more than 1994 Mazda 323.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (461 Nm) has 304 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda 323. (157 Nm). This means 2002 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chevrolet Camaro | 1994 Mazda 323 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Camaro | 323 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5700 cc | 1840 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 112 HP |
| Torque | 461 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1155 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2620 mm |
