2002 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1996 Fiat Armadillo
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Fiat Armadillo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Fiat Armadillo would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (190 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 216 kg more than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (305 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. (200 Nm). This means 2002 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. 1996 Fiat Armadillo has automatic transmission and 2002 Chevrolet Camaro has manual transmission. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Fiat Armadillo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chevrolet Camaro | 1996 Fiat Armadillo | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
| Model | Camaro | Armadillo |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1998 cc |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 200 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1374 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 1850 mm |
