2002 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (461 Nm) has 308 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser. (153 Nm). This means 2002 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Camaro | 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser | |
Make | Chevrolet | Plymouth |
Model | Camaro | Pronto Cruiser |
Year Released | 2002 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5700 cc | 1600 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 115 HP |
Torque | 461 Nm | 153 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2650 mm |