2002 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1999 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (320 HP) has 123 more horse power than 1999 Ford Econoline. (197 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 825 kg more than 2002 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (454 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm). This means 2002 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Camaro | 1999 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Camaro | Econoline |
Year Released | 2002 | 1999 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5700 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 197 HP |
Torque | 454 Nm | 338 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 3510 mm |