2002 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1999 Mazda B2500
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda B2500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda B2500 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 360 kg more than 1999 Mazda B2500.
Because 1999 Mazda B2500 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda B2500 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (461 Nm) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda B2500. (266 Nm). This means 2002 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda B2500.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Camaro | 1999 Mazda B2500 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Camaro | B2500 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1999 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5700 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 461 Nm | 266 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2990 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 80 L |