2002 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2000 Ford Equator
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Equator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Equator would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (190 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 2000 Ford Equator. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 382 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (305 Nm) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 2002 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 2002 Chevrolet Camaro has manual transmission. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Camaro | 2000 Ford Equator | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Camaro | Equator |
Year Released | 2002 | 2000 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1787 cc |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 160 Nm |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1208 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 3260 mm |