2002 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2000 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Pagani Zonda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Pagani Zonda would be higher. At 5,987 cc (12 cylinders), 2000 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Pagani Zonda (389 HP) has 69 more horse power than 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. (320 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Pagani Zonda should accelerate faster than 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 250 kg more than 2000 Pagani Zonda.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Pagani Zonda (569 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. (454 Nm). This means 2000 Pagani Zonda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Camaro | 2000 Pagani Zonda | |
Make | Chevrolet | Pagani |
Model | Camaro | Zonda |
Year Released | 2002 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 5700 cc | 5987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 389 HP |
Torque | 454 Nm | 569 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4395 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2055 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1151 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2730 mm |