2002 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2001 Daewoo Lanos
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Daewoo Lanos. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Daewoo Lanos would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 1065 kg more than 2001 Daewoo Lanos.
Because 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Daewoo Lanos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (461 Nm) has 311 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Daewoo Lanos. (150 Nm). This means 2002 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Daewoo Lanos.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Camaro | 2001 Daewoo Lanos | |
Make | Chevrolet | Daewoo |
Model | Camaro | Lanos |
Year Released | 2002 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5700 cc | 1398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 105 HP |
Torque | 461 Nm | 150 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1035 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 48 L |