2002 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2001 Volvo Hatric
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Volvo Hatric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Volvo Hatric would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Volvo Hatric (208 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. (190 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Volvo Hatric should accelerate faster than 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 139 kg more than 2001 Volvo Hatric.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (305 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Volvo Hatric. (280 Nm). This means 2002 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Volvo Hatric. 2001 Volvo Hatric has automatic transmission and 2002 Chevrolet Camaro has manual transmission. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Volvo Hatric will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chevrolet Camaro | 2001 Volvo Hatric | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
| Model | Camaro | Hatric |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 2442 cc |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 280 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1451 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2800 mm |
