2002 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2004 Mazda 6

To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 3,390 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 6 (164 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. (158 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 6 weights approximately 52 kg more than 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (271 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda 6. (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda 6.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Chevrolet Camaro 2004 Mazda 6
Make Chevrolet Mazda
Model Camaro 6
Year Released 2002 2004
Body Type Coupe Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3390 cc 2184 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 158 HP 164 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 271 Nm 207 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 92 mm 87.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84 mm 94 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 11.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1413 kg 1465 kg
Vehicle Length 4910 mm 4710 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1310 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2630 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 14 L/100km 9.1 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 64 L