2002 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 330 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo.
Because 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Camaro | 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
Model | Camaro | Dingo |
Year Released | 2002 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5700 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2450 mm |