2002 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2005 Saab 9000
To start off, 2005 Saab 9000 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (320 HP) has 155 more horse power than 2005 Saab 9000. (165 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2005 Saab 9000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Saab 9000 weights approximately 165 kg more than 2002 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Saab 9000, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (454 Nm) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Saab 9000. (280 Nm). This means 2002 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Saab 9000.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Camaro | 2005 Saab 9000 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Saab |
Model | Camaro | 9000 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5700 cc | 2290 cc |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 165 HP |
Torque | 454 Nm | 280 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1665 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 61 L |