2002 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2006 Chrysler 300

To start off, 2006 Chrysler 300 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 6,064 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine.

Because 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler 300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chrysler 300 (570 Nm) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. (461 Nm). This means 2006 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. 2006 Chrysler 300 has automatic transmission and 2002 Chevrolet Camaro has manual transmission. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Chrysler 300 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Chevrolet Camaro 2006 Chrysler 300
Make Chevrolet Chrysler
Model Camaro 300
Year Released 2002 2006
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5700 cc 6064 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 0 HP 425 HP
Torque 461 Nm 570 Nm
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4920 mm 5010 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 1310 mm 1480 mm
Wheelbase Size 2650 mm 3050 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 72 L