2002 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2006 Chrysler Pacifica
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Pacifica is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 480 kg more than 2006 Chrysler Pacifica.
Because 2006 Chrysler Pacifica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Pacifica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (461 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Chrysler Pacifica. (339 Nm). This means 2002 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Chrysler Pacifica.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Camaro | 2006 Chrysler Pacifica | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chrysler |
Model | Camaro | Pacifica |
Year Released | 2002 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5700 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 251 HP |
Torque | 461 Nm | 339 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 87 L |