2002 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2006 Volkswagen LT 35 HR Panel Van
To start off, 2006 Volkswagen LT 35 HR Panel Van is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (320 HP) has 212 more horse power than 2006 Volkswagen LT 35 HR Panel Van. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2006 Volkswagen LT 35 HR Panel Van.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (454 Nm) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Volkswagen LT 35 HR Panel Van. (280 Nm). This means 2002 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Volkswagen LT 35 HR Panel Van.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chevrolet Camaro | 2006 Volkswagen LT 35 HR Panel Van | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Volkswagen |
| Model | Camaro | LT 35 HR Panel Van |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5700 cc | 2500 cc |
| Horse Power | 320 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 454 Nm | 280 Nm |
| Top Speed | 252 km/hour | 139 km/hour |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 2580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 3560 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 80 L |
