2002 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2008 Mazda Rustler
To start off, 2008 Mazda Rustler is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 486 kg more than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Because 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Rustler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (454 Nm) has 334 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Rustler. (120 Nm). This means 2002 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Camaro | 2008 Mazda Rustler | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Camaro | Rustler |
Year Released | 2002 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 5700 cc | 1586 cc |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 454 Nm | 120 Nm |
Top Speed | 252 km/hour | 165 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1014 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 54 L |