2002 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 146 kg more than 2002 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 2008 Toyota Condor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Condor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (454 Nm) has 259 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Condor. (195 Nm). This means 2002 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chevrolet Camaro | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
| Model | Camaro | Condor |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5700 cc | 2436 cc |
| Horse Power | 320 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 454 Nm | 195 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1646 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 70 L |
