2002 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 122 kg more than 2002 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 2008 Toyota Condor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Condor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (305 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Condor. (192 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2002 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Camaro | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Camaro | Condor |
Year Released | 2002 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 2986 cc |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 305 Nm | 192 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1712 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2660 mm |