2002 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2009 Ford F-450
To start off, 2009 Ford F-450 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 6,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford F-450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford F-450 (326 HP) has 6 more horse power than 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. (320 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford F-450 should accelerate faster than 2002 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford F-450 (814 Nm) has 360 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. (454 Nm). This means 2009 Ford F-450 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Camaro | 2009 Ford F-450 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Camaro | F-450 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5700 cc | 6400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 326 HP |
Torque | 454 Nm | 814 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 6670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 2030 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 4390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 144 L |