2002 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1964 Morgan 4
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 3,350 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Impala (180 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1964 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1964 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 875 kg more than 1964 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Morgan 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Morgan 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Impala | 1964 Morgan 4 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Morgan |
Model | Impala | 4 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3350 cc | 1340 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 55 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1535 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2450 mm |