2002 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1968 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 7,010 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Mustang (335 HP) has 155 more horse power than 2002 Chevrolet Impala. (180 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2002 Chevrolet Impala.

Because 1968 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Ford Mustang (597 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 319 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chevrolet Impala. (278 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1968 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chevrolet Impala.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Chevrolet Impala 1968 Ford Mustang
Make Chevrolet Ford
Model Impala Mustang
Year Released 2002 1968
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3350 cc 7010 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 180 HP 335 HP
Torque 278 Nm 597 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 92 mm 105 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84.1 mm 101.2 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 10.6:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 5090 mm 4670 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1820 mm
Wheelbase Size 2810 mm 2750 mm