2002 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1969 Volkswagen 1600
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Volkswagen 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Volkswagen 1600 would be higher. At 3,350 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Impala (180 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1969 Volkswagen 1600. (49 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1969 Volkswagen 1600.
Because 1969 Volkswagen 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Volkswagen 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Impala | 1969 Volkswagen 1600 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volkswagen |
Model | Impala | 1600 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3350 cc | 1584 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 40 L |