2002 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1983 Rolls-Royce Corniche
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Rolls-Royce Corniche would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Rolls-Royce Corniche is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Rolls-Royce Corniche weights approximately 745 kg more than 2002 Chevrolet Impala.
Because 1983 Rolls-Royce Corniche is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Rolls-Royce Corniche. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Impala | 1983 Rolls-Royce Corniche | |
Make | Chevrolet | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Impala | Corniche |
Year Released | 2002 | 1983 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3350 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1535 kg | 2280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 3030 mm |